Former NSA, Cyber Command chief Paul Nakasone says U.S. falling behind its enemies in cyberspace
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0db7/a0db7601cfa8b1ecc52215113cff730b40b1b43d" alt=""
The United States is falling “increasingly behind” its adversaries in cyberspace, a former Cyber Command and National Security Agency boss said Saturday.
Speaking at the DistrictCon cybersecurity conference in Washington, D.C., retired Gen. Paul Nakasone said that “our adversaries are continuing to be able to broaden the spectrum of what they’re able to do to us.”
Nakasone said incidents like Chinese government-backed breaches of U.S. telecommunications companies and other critical infrastructure — as well as a steady drumbeat of ransomware attacks against U.S. targets — illustrate “the fact that we’re unable to secure our networks, the fact that we’re unable to leverage the software that’s being provided today, the fact that we have adversaries that continue to maintain this capability.”
Nakasone, who led NSA and CYBERCOM from 2018 until early last year and is now founding director of Vanderbilt University’s Institute for National Defense and Global Security, said he fears the threats of the future are only going to get more dangerous.
One example is “we are starting to see the beginnings of the bleed from the non-kinetic to the kinetic for cyber operations,” he said, referring to actual physical damage.
“What’s next is that we are going to see cyberattacks against a series of platforms being able to actually down platforms with ones and zeros,” Nakasone said.
A board member for OpenAI, Nakasone also talked about how artificial intelligence could make cyber offense more potent. Specifically, he mentioned the notion of generative targeting, such as the idea of physical drones choosing their targets powered by AI.
“We’re starting to challenge this idea of humans in the middle of the loop, and I also offer to you as we think about artificial intelligence models, think about cyber weaponry,” he said. “How far are we talking to this idea of being able to create an agent that’s going to move through your network, that’s going to change based upon topology in the network, being able to evade the defenses that are there, choosing targets of the future?”
Members of the Trump administration, and some members from both parties in Congress, have called for the United States to get more aggressive with offensive operations in cyberspace. In a separate conversation with reporters, Nakasone said he agreed with those sentiments.
Nakasone’s Cyber Command conducted operations dating back to at least 2018 to disrupt Iranian and Russian hackers in conjunction with more defensive “hunt forward” missions in other nations designed to fortify allies’ defenses and detect future threats against the United States. He also advocated for a philosophy of “persistent engagement” — to be in constant contact with cyber enemies, proactively rather than reactively.
“We need to do more of that, certainly,” Nakasone said of offensive operations. “It’s not just the only thing we need.”
One of the points of persistent engagement was to ensure anyone who attacked U.S. election infrastructure knew they would suffer consequences from the United States, he said.
“Can we be more forthcoming in terms of some of the things we did?” Nakasone said. “Yeah, I think there is opportunity.”
In his speech, Nakasone said the top priority for the United States should be hiring top talent. Under President Donald Trump, the government has been removing some of those who were in the cyber talent pipeline.
Eventually, “we’re going to have to be able to engage folks again and say, ‘Hey, please come and work in government,’” Nakasone said. It’s an open question how long any damage to the trust of potential hires will last, he said.
Another change under Trump is that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has reportedly sped up the implementation of a Cyber Command overhaul, from 180 days to 45 days.
“How doable is it? It’s really doable when you get that direction from the secretary,” Nakasone said in response to a question from CyberScoop. Asked if he was worried about whether the tightened timeline would lead to that implementation suffering, Nakasone answered only that the concepts of Cyber Command 2.0 have been in the works for a while already.
During a question-and-answer session with the DistrictCon audience, Nakasone also didn’t voice any criticisms of Trump’s purge of top military officials, such as Gen. Charles “CQ” Q. Brown, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
“At the end of the day, the president gets to choose his own principal military adviser,” he said, while praising Brown.