The ruling is a victory for election advocates who say the evidence overwhelmingly shows that voter fraud is rare and not tied to mail voting in general. 

Dissenting justices who criticized the ruling said it would have “seismic” implications for the Fourth Amendment.

A ruling could come this summer in Chatrie v. United States, which could have bigger ramifications about the scope of government surveillance.

Chatrie v. United States asks whether a single warrant can justify a location-data dragnet — and what “probable cause” means when the search starts with basically everyone…

The three lawmakers said the reported lifting of a stop-work order on a $2 million Paragon Solutions contract threatens Americans’ fundamental rights.

The Administrative Office of the United States Courts denied ignoring expert advice in a letter to Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., who blasted Chief Justice Roberts in a…

As some observers predicted, Democratic commissioners are racking up lower court victories, but the highest court in the country appears skeptical.

The Oregon Democrat cited recent news of a major hack and years of “covering up” explanations of incidents.

The rules, introduced during the Biden administration, would force telecoms to notify customers when their personally identifiable information is exposed in a hack.

A budget summary doesn’t give specific details on which programs it would cut, instead providing a broad outline.