Three justices wrote in a dissent that longstanding privacy laws protecting sensitive personal data held by the government should prevent the use of the database.

Chatrie v. United States asks whether a single warrant can justify a location-data dragnet — and what “probable cause” means when the search starts with basically everyone…

In a 2-1 decision, an appeals court upheld a 1935 Supreme Court precedent restricting the president’s ability to fire FTC commissioners. 

A budget summary doesn’t give specific details on which programs it would cut, instead providing a broad outline.

She said at her confirmation hearing that CISA needs to be “smaller, more nimble” and it has gone “far off-mission.”

In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s Murthy decision, legal experts see an uphill fight for conspiracy theorists.

Over the course of his term, Joe Biden has presided over an ambitious agenda on regulation and more, to both praise and criticism.

Sen. Mark Warner said influence operations are easy and cheap, and their social media audience is more willing to believe them.

Critics of the high court's decision not to hear the case say the justices have struck a blow against civil liberties.

The case over the National Security Agency's digital monitoring activities could have major implications for the future of government spying.